Two Banjos At Once: The Blog

Living with standards compliance

Ada Lovelace Day: The Sarahs

March 24, 2010

There’s a bumper sticker you’ll see a lot around northern California: “Be the change that you want to see.” I’m not usually persuaded by the greeting-card pithiness of bumper sticker slogans, but this one, for some reason, sticks with me. I’m alert to opportunities to be the change that I want to see–my impulse has elements of rebellion left over from my punk rock past–and I admire people who have also chosen to do things differently, to be the change.

In April 2009 two programmers attended the Golden Gate Ruby conference. While there, they learned many things about Ruby programming they sought to, and, regrettably, some they didn’t. For this was the conference which included Matt Aimonetti’s infamously tasteless CouchDB + Ruby: Perform Like a Pr0n Star presentation. While attending this and other presentations, the two programmers looked around and started counting all the attendees who were women. This was an easy task–including themselves, only seven women attended this conference.

Were it me, or many of us, I would’ve left the conference disappointed by that ratio–and then done nothing else. But these two programmers were the super Sarahs: Sarah Allen and Sarah Mei, and the matter didn’t rest there. No, not with their experience in both the tech industry and community development. Want to see more female Ruby programmers? Well, then, make some!

And so on June 13, 2009 a mob of us would-be Rubyists were seated in the very nice conference rooms of Orange Labs, fumbling through developing a basic application in RoR, pushing it to Github, and admiring our handiwork on Heroku. Assisting us were the most solicitous, patient, and caring volunteers ever, nearly all of them men.

The one-day introductory course had enrolled its maximum. Even before this day had finished the Sarahs and the volunteers had to plan another. Not only had they identified a common need, but they had met it so graciously that many of us aspired to be one of those cool volunteers ourselves some day.

And so, one year later, the local Ruby Meetups have more women attending every time, some even as presenters.  One year from now I hope we won’t even have to do this kind of census.   But to get there we have to be the change we want to see–and it’s great the Sarahs have shown us how to do that.

Ada Lovelace Day: the women of keypunch

March 25, 2009

Once upon a time, it was the year 1980.  Computers were regarded, vaguely, as something one should know more about, kind of like biotech at the present:  a guarantee of stable, well-paid employment to the person who was skilled with them.  What we considered computers seemed much more various than now—the devices included the Pong gaming console my dad bought at Sears, the mainframes down at the community college, the Commodore PETs in my junior high’s computer lab, and whatever it was that my friend Wendy’s mom had worked on using punched cards.

Back then, there was this joke about being “folded, spindled, or mutilated;” it was usually a metaphor for being mistreated by dour, inflexible bureaucrats. Most of us got the joke, both because we were all subject to bureaucracy, and because all of us had seen punched cards, pieces of tagboard also vulnerable to maiming by unfeeling entities.  Think of most large- or medium-scale processes, like assembling all the grades of the freshman class, or billing the customers of the gigantic Bell System: punched cards, and keypunch operators, were behind them.


Keypunch machine. Photo by inky

The keypunch operators were typically women.  The work was considered clerical, and paid less than technical work assumed by men.  The keypunch operators were nevertheless proud of their occupations, which held more status than being a secretary or nurse.  A smaller number of women were accepted as programmers, the ones who submitted the punched cards to the all-mighty computer.  Both roles required a greater degree of double-checking and focus than I think our jobs demand of us now:  there was no Command-Z to reverse a mistake.  They also seemed to pose a lot more physical discomfort:  noisier machines, nearly Arctic temperatures, and no Aeron chairs.

Yet the women I’ve met who were employed as operators or programmers during this era of computing still have positive memories of the experience.  They enjoyed having such esoteric skills.  They liked going to the customers’ sites and solving the customers’ problems.  They never considered their work incompatible with being feminine, or having lives outside work.  They don’t know why most of their own daughters and granddaughters didn’t jump into careers or degrees in computing.

I know why, at least in my case.  In 1980 my friend Wendy’s mom was explaining how to use a punched card program to one of my eighth-grade classmates—a boy.  And my junior high computer lab was filled with students from the Gifted program huddled around the keyboards and monitors—all of the students, boys.  The program director encouraged us girls to while away the hour in the band practice room instead.  We acquiesced; computers had acquired the stigma of being uncool, despite how diverting Pong could be.  Computers didn’t seem to do anything we found interesting, but we really didn’t get the time to investigate them too thoroughly: the boys in the lab made us feel too unwelcome.

What a tantalizing alternative history this would be, had we persisted.  Had the legacy of the keypunch operators become that of subsequent eras in technology —a tradition of female participation sustained, even considered commonplace.  Had computers become what they are today—ordinary appliances for use by all—but twenty or thirty years sooner.  What we be doing now?

Powered by WordPress